Prescott:погуглите про ботлнекинг
Вот что нашёл:
http://www.pcgamer.com/will-your-cpu-bo ... cs-card/2/" target="_blank
Will Your CPU Bottleneck that Video Card?
In short, depending on the game, if the CPU's load is consistently very high already, the CPU will very likely hold back the performance of video card upgrades. By profiling the CPU and GPU load of games you normally play, you can make better decisions for your upgrade path. Based on the results from this test:
* If the CPU load is maxed out at 100 percent across the board, the CPU needs to be upgraded first.
* If the CPU load is hovering between 70 percent and 100 percent, a video card upgrade will still offer an improvement, but the upgrade path is limited. Unless you plan on upgrading the CPU in the near future, avoid high-end video cards. A GeForce GTX 960 or Radeon R9 280 is about the most powerful card that should be considered.
* If the CPU load is below 70 percent most of the time, any video card upgrade will likely not be bottlenecked.
However, with lower overhead APIs such as Mantle, DirectX 12, and Vulkan, one can expect a bit more life out of old CPUs in the future.
То есть если загрузка проца 100%
across the board или повсеместно, то только тогда менять проц. Пока загрузка плавает между 70-100% - менять ВК:
With this as the baseline, the GTX 460 SE is certainly under almost full load for most of the games, but the CPU is under a high load of above 70 percent as well. This configuration will definitely bottleneck a video card upgrade. The question is, how much?
Мне искренне не понятно, почему все считают что процессор должен "гулять" в играх? И проц и ВК должны маслать на полную и отрабатывать потраченные на них деньги. Или я не прав?
У меня на текущей платформе уже их штук 5-6 сменилось, и как было неприятно осознавать что 1070 сюда избыточна, а взял бы 3770К в свое время, то горя бы не знал
він якийсь дивний